Reliable PECB - ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor - Exam ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam Voucher

The ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam can advance your professional standing. Passing the PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam is the requirement to become PECB Professionals and to get your name included. Practicing with PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Dumps is considered the best strategy to test the exam readiness. After passing the ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam you will become a valuable asset for the company you work for or want to work. You don't need to sacrifice your job hours or travel to distant training institutes for exam preparation when you have PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Dumps for instant success. These ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor dumps questions with authentic answers are compiled by PECB professionals and follow the actual exam’s questioning style.

In today's world, the ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam (ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor) certification exam has become increasingly popular, providing professionals with the opportunity to upskill and stay competitive in the tech industry. At Getcertkey, we understand the importance of obtaining the PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Certification in the PECB sector, where technological advancements constantly evolving.

>> Exam ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Voucher <<

Hot Exam ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Voucher | Easy To Study and Pass Exam at first attempt & Free Download ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor: ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam

The ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor web-based practice exam requires no installation so you can start your preparation instantly right after you purchase. With thousands of satisfied customers around the globe, questions of the ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam (ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor) exam dumps are real so you can pass the ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam (ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor) certification on the very first attempt. Hence, it reduces your chances of failure and you can save money and time as well. PECB exam questions come in three formats i.e., web-based practice test, desktop practice test software, and PDF dumps.

PECB ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam Sample Questions (Q174-Q179):

NEW QUESTION # 174
What did the audit team use to assess the implementation of AI-related controls, verify compliance with established procedures, and identify any gaps in adherence to the AIMS requirements? Refer to Scenario 6

A. Evidence collection tools
B. Observation checklist
C. Evidence collection analysis
D. Evidence collection procedures

Answer: A

Explanation:
In Scenario 6, it is clearly stated:
"They also used sampling and technical verification to assess the implementation of AI-related controls, verify compliance with established procedures, and identify any gaps in adherence to the AIMS requirements." Sampling and technical verification are considered evidence collection tools used during audits. These tools enable auditors to validate the effectiveness of implemented controls by selectively reviewing samples, performing walkthroughs, and technically verifying how AI systems function in real-life scenarios.
According to ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.5.5, audit evidence may be obtained through tools such as:
* Interviews
* Observations
* Technical testing
* Sampling
* Documentation review
This confirms that the audit team used "evidence collection tools" - specifically sampling and technical verification - to perform their assessments.
Reference:
ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.5.5 - Audit methods and tools
ISO/IEC 42001:2023, Clause 9.2 - Collection of objective evidence
PECB ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Study Guide - Section: Evidence Collection Tools in AI Audits
===========
Certainly! Below are the responses to Questions 51 through 54 from Scenario 7, presented in your requested format, with verified explanations aligned with ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, ISO 19011:
2018, and the PECB Lead Auditor Study Guide.
-

NEW QUESTION # 175
Scenario 7 (continued):
Scenario 7: ICure, headquartered in Bratislava, is a medical institution known for its use of the latest technologies in medical practices. Ithas introduced groundbreaking Al-driven diagnostics and treatment planning tools that have fundamentally transformed patient care.
ICure has integrated a robust artificial intelligence management system AIMS to manage its Al systems effectively. This holisticmanagement framework ensures that ICure's Al applications are not only developed but also deployed and maintained to adhere to the highest industry standards, thereby enhancing efficiency and reliability.
ICure has initiated a comprehensive auditing process to validate its AIMS's effectiveness in alignment with ISO/IEC 42001. The stage 1audit involved an on-site evaluation by the audit team. The team evaluated the site-specific conditions, interacted with ICure's personnel, observed the deployed technologies, and reviewed the operations that support the AIMS. Following these observations, the findings weredocumented and communicated to ICure. setting the stage for subsequent actions.
Unforeseen delays and resource allocation issues introduced a significant gap between the completion of stage
1 and the onset of stage2 audits. This interval, while unplanned, provided an opportunity for reflection and preparation for upcoming challenges.
After four months, the audit team initiated the stage 2 audit. They evaluated AIMS's compliance with ISO
/IEC 42001 requirements, payingspecial attention to the complexity of processes and their documentation. It was during this phase that a critical observation was made:
ICure had not fully considered the complexity of its processes and their interactions when determining the extent of documentedinformation. Essential processes related to Al model training, validation, and deployment were not documented accurately, hinderingeffective control and management of these critical activities. This issue was recorded as a minor nonconformity, signaling a need forenhanced control and management of these vital activities.
Simultaneously, the auditor evaluated the appropriateness and effectiveness of the "AIMS Insight Strategy," a procedure developed by ICure to determine the AIMS internal and external challenges. This examination identified specific areas for improvement, particularly in the way stakeholder input was integrated into the system. It highlighted how this could significantly enhance the contribution of relevant parties in strengthening the system's resilience and effectiveness.
The audit team determined the audit findings by taking into consideration the requirements of ICure, the previous audit records and conclusions, the accuracy, sufficiency, and appropriateness of evidence, the extent to which planned audit activities are realized and planned results achieved, the sample size, and the categorization of the audit findings. The audit team decided to first record all the requirements met; then they proceeded to record the nonconformities.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Question:
Did the audit team consider all the necessary aspects when determining audit findings?

A. Yes, the audit team considered all the necessary aspects for determining audit findings
B. No, audit team did not consider the findings exceeding normal practices or opportunities for improvement
C. No, the audit team overlooked the importance of the auditee's feedback in shaping the audit findings

Answer: A

Explanation:
The scenario states that the audit team considered:
* audit objectives
* audit criteria
* planned results
* sample size
* conformity to requirements
* and previous records - all key elements ofaudit evidence analysis.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.4.5andISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.6confirm that audit findings must be based onobjective evidence, conformity criteria, and audit scope.This matches what the audit team did, confirming full compliance.
Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.4.5; ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.6.

NEW QUESTION # 176
A company develops an AI-based health monitoring system that provides insights and recommendations to users. However, users have reported that they do not understand how the system arrives at its recommendations. Which core element should the company enhance to improve user trust and understanding?

A. Fairness and Non-Discrimination
B. Human-Centered Design
C. Safety and Reliability
D. Transparency and Explainability

Answer: D

Explanation:
The issue in this case revolves aroundusers not understanding the reasoning or logicbehind the AI- generated recommendations. The relevant core element isTransparency and Explainability.
According toISO/IEC 42001:2023 - Clause 6.1.2 and Clause 8.2.3, transparency refers to theclarity of processes, decisions, and data use, while explainability focuses on makingAI system outputs understandableto human users.
ThePECB Lead Auditor Guideidentifies this as a key factor in buildingtrust, usability, and ethical AI adoption, especially insensitive domainslike healthcare.

NEW QUESTION # 177
Scenario 8 (continued):
Scenario 8:
Scenario 8: InnovateSoft, headquartered in Berlin, Germany, is a software development company known for its innovative solutions andcommitment to excellence. It specializes in custom software solutions, development, design, testing, maintenance, and consulting,covering both mobile apps and web development.
Recently, the company underwent an audit to evaluate the effectiveness and compliance of its artificial intelligence management system AIMS against ISO/IEC 42001.
The audit team engaged with the auditee to discuss their findings and observations during the audit's final phases. After evaluating theevidence, the audit team presented their audit findings to InnovateSoft, highlighting the identified nonconformities.
Upon receiving the audit findings, InnovateSoft accepted the conclusions but expressed concerns about some findings inaccuratelyreflecting the efficiency of their software development processes. In response, the company provided new evidence and additionalinformation to alter the audit conclusions for a couple of minor nonconformities identified. After thorough consideration, theaudit teamleader clarified that the new evidence did not significantly alter the core conclusions drawn for the nonconformities. Therefore, thecertification body issued a certification recommendation conditional upon the filing of corrective action plans without a prior visit.
InnovateSoft accepted the decision of the certification body. The top management of the company also sought suggestions from theaudit team on resolving the identified nonconformities. The audit team leader offered solutions to address the issues, fostering acollaborative effort between the auditors and InnovateSoft.During the closing meeting, the audit team covered key topics to enhance transparency. They clarified to InnovateSoft that the auditevidence was based on a sample, acknowledging the inherent uncertainty. The method and time frame of reporting and grading findingswere discussed to provide a structured overview of nonconformities. The certification body's process for handling nonconformities,including potential consequences, guided InnovateSoft on corrective actions. The time frame for presenting a plan for correction was communicated, emphasizing urgency. Insights into the certification body's post-audit activities were provided, ensuring ongoing support.
Lastly, the audit team briefed InnovateSoft on complaint and appeal handling.
InnovateSoft submitted the action plans for each nonconformity separately, describing only the detected issues and the correctiveactions planned to address the detected nonconformities. However, the submission slightly exceeded the specified period of 45 days setby the certification body, arriving three days later.
InnovateSoft explained this by attributing the delay to unexpected challengesencountered during the compilation of the action plans.
After being recommended for certification (pending submission of corrective actions), InnovateSoft did not notify the auditor about completion of corrections and corrective actions.
Question:
Is this acceptable?

A. Yes, since the auditee was recommended for certification upon the submission of corrective action plans without a prior visit
B. No, audit team leader must be informed to evaluate the effectiveness of the actions with a visit on the auditee's site
C. No, the auditee is required to inform the auditor about the completion status of the corrections and corrective actions

Answer: C

Explanation:
The auditee mustformally inform the certification body(or designated auditor) once corrective actions are completed - even if no follow-up visit is required.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.4.9.3requires the auditor toreview evidence of correction and corrective actions, and the client is responsible for providing this.
* TheLead Auditor Manualemphasizes:"The audit team cannot confirm closure of nonconformities without documented evidence or confirmation from the auditee." Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.4.9.3; ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Study Guide - Section 9 ("Audit Closure").

NEW QUESTION # 178
Did ImoAI take the correct initial step after the major nonconformity was detected?
Scenario 9: ImoAl, headquartered in California. USA, provides Al solutions for various industries such as finance, healthcare, retail, and manufacturing. Its clients include major financial institutions seeking Al powered fraud detection systems, healthcare providers leveraging Al for diagnostics and patient care, retailers optimizing supply chain management with Al forecasting, and manufacturers enhancing production efficiency through Al-driven automation.
ImoAl has recently undergone a certification audit to ensure that its artificial intelligence management system AIMS is in compliance with ISO/IEC 42001. During the audit, a major nonconformity related to data security protocols was identified, requiring urgent resolution.
ImoAl swiftly initiated corrective actions to address the
major nonconformity. The audit follow-up, in agreement with the auditee, was scheduled six weeks after the initial audit. As part of exploring alternatives to audit follow-up, the audit team leader chose to verify the effectiveness of the actions taken by the auditee by scheduling a specific visit to ImoAI's premises.
The follow-up audit involved a thorough evaluation of the effectiveness of these actions. The audit team leader thoroughly examined the corrections, corrective actions, and root cause analysis conducted by ImoAl to assess whether they adequately addressed the nonconformity identified during the initial audit.
In conjunction with the external audit follow-up, ImoAl engaged its internal auditing team to oversee the progress of corrective actions. The AIMS manager of ImoAl updated Ms. Rebecca Hayes, the internal auditor, on the status of corrections and corrective actions prompted by the nonconformity identified during the external audit. Subsequently, Ms. Hayes thoroughly reviewed these measures, analyzing the corrections, root causes, and effectiveness of the implemented actions.
Upon satisfactory validation of the action plans, ImoAl was recommended for certification.

A. No, as it should have waited for further instructions from the certification body before taking action
B. Yes, as it promptly initiated corrective actions to address the major nonconformity
C. No, because it should have immediately informed its clients about the detected nonconformity

Answer: B

Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 10.2 (Nonconformity and Corrective Action) and ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.6.3, organizations are expected to act promptly to correct and prevent recurrence of detected nonconformities. ImoAI correctly initiated corrective actions immediately after a major nonconformity was found. This is the recommended and required first step to contain and resolve issues and demonstrate responsibility.
* Notifying clients is not a mandatory first step unless the nonconformity directly affects them.
* Waiting for instructions from the certification body could unnecessarily delay resolution.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 10.2 - Corrective Action
ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.6.3 - Corrective action expectations following audit findings
===========

NEW QUESTION # 179
......

It is our mission to help you pass the exam. ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor guide torrent will provide you with 100% assurance of passing the professional qualification exam. We are very confident in the quality of ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor study guide. And we believe that all students who have purchased our study materials will be able to successfully pass the professional qualification exam as long as they follow the content provided by ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor study guide, study it on a daily basis, and conduct regular self-examination through mock exams. Once you unfortunately fail the exam, ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Guide Torrent will provide you with a full refund and the refund process is very simple. As long as you provide your staff with your transcripts, you will receive a refund soon. Of course, before you buy, ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor certification training offers you a free trial service, as long as you log on our website, you can download our trial questions bank for free. I believe that after you try ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor certification training, you will love them.

Exam ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Price: https://www.getcertkey.com/ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor_braindumps.html

In order to provide the high-quality service to our customers, our company offer free renewal of ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor study guide for one year to those people who make a purchase of our practice test questions, PECB Exam ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Voucher How to satisfy the customers' needs is considered by the provider, PECB Exam ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Voucher As an old saying goes, chances favor only the prepared mind.

Be sure to review any illustrative phrases or sentences because they will often ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor help clarify the rule, When designing a network, it is important to have an idea of how the different areas of the network should be connected together.

ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam free valid pdf & PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor sure pass exam dumps

In order to provide the high-quality service to our customers, our company offer free renewal of ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Study Guide for one year to those people who make a purchase of our practice test questions.

How to satisfy the customers' needs is considered Exam ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Price by the provider, As an old saying goes, chances favor only the prepared mind, We not only provide you the best ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor real exam questions and ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor test dumps vce pdf but also good service.

If you do not receive our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor study materials, please contact our online workers.